Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

NRL News - May 2007

NRL and Coaches Amend contentious Obstruction Rule

May 1st 2007 04:40
MEDIA RELAESE -www.NRL.com.au




NRL coaches and refereeing officials agreed to make minor changes to the contentious obstruction rulings curently blighting the game, at a specially convened phone hook up at League headquarters today.

With debate raging amongst players, officials and fans alike over the interpretation of the new rulings, Referee's coach Robert Finch called an emergency meeting between all sixteen Telstra Premiership coaches and NRL referees today in an attempt to clarify and modify the current air of confusion surrounding the amended ruling.


The conference was unanimous in declaring that the 'obstruction' rule will always be a subjective call made by the match referees, with the coaches agreeing that they must respect the judegements of the officials.

"There was genuine attempt from all parties last year to be more
prescriptive and to provide clearer guidelines about the mechanics of
what could and could not lead to an obstruction call," Referees Coach
Robert Finch said today.

"What we've agreed is that you can't try and be too prescriptive and
that coaches, players and fans have to accept that some things need to
come down to the judgment of the referee or the video referee.

"There may still be some debate in this area, but for referees the
deciding factor will be whether they believe a player who was in a
position to make a tackle was impeded."


KEY INDICATOR DEFINITION CHANGES 2007 - OBSTRUCTION


Point 1

Current interpretation:


"The ball carrier cannot run behind a decoy runner and gain an advantage
regardless of any contact between the decoy and the defence"



This interpretation has been eliminated and the current interpretation
as per the Laws of the Game will be enforced:

Section 2 Glossary -


"Obstruction is an illegal act of impeding an opponent who does not have
the ball."



Point 2


Current interpretation


"It is the responsibility of the decoy runner/s NOT to interfere with
the defending team."



This interpretation remains with the following understanding:

"Any attacking player/s who is in front of the ball must make every
endeavour not to interfere with the defending team."



All other points set out in the 2007 Key Indicators remain unchanged.



28
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
39 Posts
48 Posts
818 Posts dating from February 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by StephenP
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]